How the Raptors Out-Executed the Pacers During Their Late Run

With 11:30 left in the Pacers’ second game of 2014, Luis Scola hit a cutting C.J. Watson for a layup. This bucket cut Toronto’s lead to one, and Indiana began to jog back down the court to play defense.

But Watson didn’t jog back. He got right into a one-man-press, applying full court D on Grevis Vasquez, who was promptly called for carrying the ball under C.J.’s pressure.

Indiana now had the ball, down one, with 11:25 on the clock. They ran Danny Granger off a curl and got him the ball in the high post. He spun off his man and got a tough layup to fall.

The Pacers had the lead. This is the part of the game where they usually put teams away, and this was the Raptors — not exactly one of the elite teams in the league.

So why didn’t the Pacers come away with the W? Let’s take a look.

After Roy Hibbert got his fifth foul on a fairly questionable call, the Raptors run a cool set where John Salmons pops to the left wing off a pin-down screen.


With Danny Granger struggling to get through the pick, Salmons catches the ball, dribbles to the middle of the court and looks to drive to the hoop.

Ian Mahinmi is there to shut off the lance, and Watson hedges over to, correctly, play help defense; he doesn’t totally help off the shooter, but takes a jab in the direction of a penetrating Salmons to curb the drive.


Vasquez cleverly relocates on the perimeter, however, and Salmons kicks it to Vasquez, who knocks down an open three.

Ultimately, with Mahinmi there to protect the rim, Watson shouldn’t have come so far off his man. Vasquez from behind the arc was more of a threat than Salmons trying to hit a pull-up jumper/floater over a 7-footer (and Granger was in decent position to prevent the dump down to a rolling Hansbrough).


To his credit, Watson responds with a 3 on the other end.

The game then plays out with a Pacers stop, a double tech, a Luis Scola turnover, two free throws by Terrence Ross. Then came a few missed field goals, some missed free throws, and a Scola jumper that tied it back up at 72.

There were now seven and a half minutes left — and the Raptors were about to take over by exploiting Indiana’s defense through a series of well-run sets.

The first was a tricky double ball screen for Vasquez set by Tyler Hansbrough and Ross.


After the initial pick, Ross rolls. Hansbrough follows and sets a downscreen for him. Paul George chases Ross through the pick.


Vasquez hits Ross as he curls into the lane well ahead of George. This basically turns into screen and roll, with Hansbrough rolling and West helping to stop Ross’s drive. This leaves Hansbrough open heading to the hoop, so he has no trouble catching the pass from Ross.


Scola rotates over and help on the Hansbrough threat, but he is a step late. Hansbrough is able to get the shot off and make it to give the Raptors the lead. (Bear in mind: If Hibbert was in the game and not on the bench in foul trouble that shot is probably not going down.)


A few minutes later, with just over four and a half minutes left, the Raptors have increased their lead to 7 after getting to the line a few times. Hibbert has returned to the floor, and if the Pacers get a stop they’re certainly back in the game.

Toronto has other ideas, however, and run a cool set where Kyle Lowry gets an on-ball screen while DeMar DeRozan comes up off a pindown in the corner.


Paul George makes the fatal decision to go under this pindown instead of fighting through it.


DeRozan recognizes George cheating under the screen, and flares out for an open jumper that he knocks down.


This shot put the Raptors up 10.

After this run, the Pacers never came back.

Tags: Xs & Os

  • achoo

    i dont know, i think the Raptors are an ok team but this is giving them too much credit. their offense didn’t beat the Pacers, their shot making did. (and a lil bit of home cookin from the zebras)
    Yeah, “cool” play designs sure, but not like the Pacers didn’t defend them right. CJ helping out on a cutter with no Hibbert in the post? makes sense to me.

    following the 74-74 tie (with 6:58 remaining) this is what the Raptors did:
    2-2 FTs (shooting foul)
    20 ft jumper
    missed 19 ft jumper
    2-2 FTs (blocking foul)
    2-2 FTs (shooting foul)
    19 ft jumper
    17 ft jumper
    missed 3 pointer
    “layup” (following a cheap “steal” – lowry reaches in and ross knocks Hill off balance as he recovers)
    2-2 FTs (shooting foul)
    1-2 FTs (shooting foul)
    missed jumper (blocked by PG)
    2-2 FTs (white flag by Pacers)

    to me that looks like this:
    took 10 long jumpers—
    —made 3 of them
    —bailed out by refs on 4 of them (resulting in 7-8 FTs)
    —got 1 blocked
    —missed the other 2
    inbalance in foul calls—
    —Pacers in the penalty with nearly 6min remaining
    —no call on the Raptors’ “steal”/layup
    —no Hibbert

    So execution of plays… sure… they took 10 long jumpers and 3 of them went in… i think that’s the Pacers gameplan right? getting bailed out 4 times though? Pacers fouled on 4 out of 10 shot attempts? does that sound right to anyone?

    i say let them shoot 17-20 foot jumpers all game long.
    if they win they win. who cares? no need to change who you are because a team is hitting shots.
    i mean seriuosly
    10 shots
    –30% go in
    –70% are missed

    but of those missed:
    –57% are fouls?

    yeah right, not going to see that too often. statistical abberation.

    • Tim

      Fair points. I rewatched the run quite a few times, and didn’t include those free throws because most just came in transition with the Raps getting back quickly.

      But Scola being late over to help, and PG cheating under the screen, those gave up four crucial points that I thought were worth mentioning. However, a lot of this is irrelevant if Hibbert doesn’t get those silly 4th and 5th fouls, as I doubt the Raptors would want to attack the rim as much as they did with him in the game.

      Anyway, thanks for the comment – Tim

  • Pingback: Frank Vogel Goes Raptor Hunting | 8 Points, 9 Seconds