Why Moving Up for Dion Waiters Could Help the Pacers

With the NBA Draft today, the Pacers have a chance to further solidify an already promising future. In a deep draft, Indiana should be able to find an impact player even with the 26th pick in the draft. But Kevin Pritchard has famously been a fan of moving up to make a big splash on draft day. And there may be a very good reason to try to swing a major deal today that nets them a top ten pick: Syracuse sophomore, Dion Waiters.

Waiters is one of the more polarizing players in the draft. No one seems to be able to agree on where he should be drafted. The Cavs have reportedly expressed some interest at taking Waiters as high as fourth overall. Since DraftExpress has him going to Golden State at #7, that seems like a reach. Then again, the Cavs took Tristan Thompson last year at #4 in what many considered a reach, so I wouldn’t put it past them to surprise some people again.

Regardless, it’s safe to say that Waiters will still be on the board at pick #4, definitely gone before the lottery ends and likely gone by pick #10.

However, he does have a lot of the attributes that lead to a player slipping in the draft. For starters, I would bet my vintage #37 Nick Van Exel Warriors jersey that Jay Bilas uses the word “tweener” when describing him. At 6’4, it is tough for scouts to pencil him in as either a point guard or a shooting guard. He has rarely played any point guard in his career, but 6’4 is a little short for the prototypical shooting guard according to some scouts (you know, because it hasn’t been working out for Dwyane Wade or anything).

Another red flag for some teams is that he is only a sophomore and he came off of the bench last season. While Jim Boeheim brought him off the bench in order keep a balanced lineup, the point is that he is not the most experienced player on the board. The other big deterrent for some teams is that his ceiling seems relatively low compared to some other players in the draft. He doesn’t exactly scream All-NBA First Team. The most common NBA comparison used for him is DeShawn Stevenson.

But all those things are for if you want to focus on the negatives.

The positive attributes about Waiters are just as apparent. While some may have issues with his height, he comes into the league with NBA-strength and he will only get stronger. He showed flashes of great defense in college and if he commits himself to the craft he could make a name for himself as great perimeter defender.

He is a very solid spot-up shooter and most believe that his shot will only improve. He also showed a nice stroke off the dribble in college so he would not be helpless in one-on-one situations. More importantly, he is has a constant motor and is always looking to run in transition. His strength and desire to take it to the rim in the fast-break are a great qualities that should at least allow him to draw fouls on a consistent basis.

And when we compare him to DeShawn Stevenson we are not claiming that he will get a five dollar bill tattooed on his neck, put an ATM in his kitchen, or get arrested for public intoxication. We’re talking about the Stevenson who has carved out a twelve-year career (and counting) and brought toughness and tenacity to a Dallas Mavericks’ championship team.

Waiters has the opportunity to be a high-energy player that will not back down to big moments or high-profile opponents. He is the type of player that the Pacers could have used against the Heat in the playoffs this year. I’m not trying to say he would get huge playoff minutes as a rookie, but he could contribute and that is what’s most important right now for an Indiana team that wants to take another step forward next season: immediate contribution.

Waiters is not shy on confidence either. He has always been quick to point out his skill set and the talents of his teammates. By coming off the bench for an incredibly talented Syracuse team he proved to have that rare combination of confidence and willingness to do what is needed to help the team. He is ultra-competitive and he seems to be a willing student of the game.

If the Pacers are hoping to keep the bulk of their team together moving forward (a very sensible plan in its own right) then small moves like adding Waiters in a trade that may cost them an older player who will become more expensive sooner (like, say, Darren Collison) can make all the difference. Ironically, I could see Waiters having a similar rookie impact as Kawhi Leonard, whose draft rights the Pacers traded to the Spurs a year ago.

Waiters may not come in and win Rookie of the Year, but he could be a huge spark for the Pacers if given the opportunity.

Topics: 2012 NBA Draft

Want more from 8 Points, 9 Seconds?  
Subscribe to FanSided Daily for your morning fix. Enter your email and stay in the know.
  • trifecta3131

    Well, it’s better than the Austin Rivers idea, but still, I wouldn’t move up into the top 10 to get him. The price will be too high (probably DC + Tyler) & he’s not a proven enough commodity. 6th man as a ‘Cuse sophmore? There’s probably a reason for that beyond what Beoheim will tell you. Let someone else gamble on him.
    Draft Kendall Marshall!!! Marshall is a leader. And we need a real floor general out there.

  • Jason

    I’ve been saying this for weeks. If we could turn DC and a pick or two into Waiters, I think that would be a great gamble. It’s refreshing to see someone else thinking along similar lines.

  • Conor

    I like the idea of Waiters, but Lance Stephenson could fit this role if he improves over the summer like the Pacers’ organization expects him to. If we trade up, I would say pick a center or point guard because we do not have a decent backup for Roy or Hill. How much I love DC and his play coming off the bench in the playoffs, I doubt he wants to be a backup point guard for his career. If we don’t trade him now, he will walk away in free agency so we might as well shop him now.

  • Jesse

    Waiters sounds good, but I don’t think the Pacers can get that high without giving away too many assets. And it makes no sense to trade Hansbro right now–his stock has never been lower. I don’t think he can regress any more. I don’t think any teams would be interested in DC, Hansbro and the 26 for that pick–there would be better offers.

  • Jason

    I think the likelihood of us moving up is pretty slim – we have been linked to no rumors thus far, and it’s rare for things to happen completely unexpected (the Jazz/Nets DWill trade withstanding – the exception that proves the rule, no?).

    If we hold steady at no. 26, and Fab Melo – Waiters’ fellow Orange – drops to us, that would be the best case scenario.

  • Jack

    After reading this post, and watching the Waiters highlight video, I was extremely tempted to say, Yeah.. Let’s deal out DC and try to grab Dion. But I’m going to stick to my guns and say that it’s not a good idea. To me, the Pacers best chance of winning a title is in the next 1-3 years, and getting rid of an already solid and at times exceptional back-up like DC in exchange for a gamble like Waiters just doesn’t make sense. Anyone recall how vital DC was for us in the playoffs this year? He was huge. I remember during one quarter of a game versus the Heat when he was the only player who didn’t look afraid. He’s carried the Pacers plenty of times. Keep DC. I really hope we can snag Draymond at #26 tonight, but either way, I’m pumped up to see what happens.

  • Realist

    Keep DC

  • Jason

    You trade DC while you still have him. He’s not staying in Indy to backup Hill. He’s a starting caliber guy. You ride him one more year and he leaves you for nothing after, or you use him as a trade asset and get something in return. He’s on his rookie contract still, so you can only trade him for someone else on the same pay scale. DC is gone, no matter how much we all like him. And trust me, I love DC. But if we put our eggs in Hill’s basket, DC is expendable.

  • Jack

    Miles Plumlee??? good grief.

  • andrew zook

    tonight sucked!! I’m so baffled by the pick.. I was really hoping they would go after Green or take PG3 since he fell that far. They could have traded back into the 2nd round to take Plumlee I hope it turns out benefiting the team, but I just don’t know.

  • trifecta3131

    What a fcking joke. Plumlee? Seriously??? … Seriously??? This is def the worst Pacers pick I’ve ever seen & one of the worst 1st round picks of any team… EVER! D@mn it Pacers.
    … On the flip, here’s the bright side … … …
    There is no fcking bright side here. THIS PICK FCKING SUCKS! I want a redo.
    PJ3 or Moultier or Green or Teague or even me? I bet I can tie Plumlee in a 1 on 1 game… because neither of us will ever score a fcking pt.
    DAMN IT!!!!!!!@#^!#%!%T!#^!$

  • Lebron

    Pritchhhhhhaaaaaaarrrrrrrdddddd !!!!!!!

  • Jack

    and to back up the shtty Plumlee pick, we waste money buying Orlando Johnson. Why the hell do we always do this?? I’m completely baffled. Makes no sense.

  • Jack

    who knows. i may turn out to be the biggest Miles Plumlee fan that ever existed, but right now, I’m pissed.

  • Zac

    Not thrilled with Plumlee but he does fit the need a backup center though i’d have though ezeli might have been a better choice. I do like Johnson in the second round though.

  • FreeAgentID

    Good luck Pacers! Choose wisely!